Public Broadcast

NOVA · s53e1

Asteroids: Spark of Life?

Published February 25, 2026
Geology Astrobiology Origins of Life Paleontology

I sat down to watch NOVA Season 53, Episode 1 (“Asteroids: Spark of Life?”) with a cup of coffee and the expectation that it would be another polished "science-is-cool" hour. It absolutely was that, but it was also a really fun detective story about how scientists try to reconstruct the earliest chapters of Earth's history when most of the book has been burned, recycled, and rewritten by geology.1

Early Earth
Landsat 8 satellite image of the Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains, South Africa, showing the ancient greenstone belt geology
Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains, South Africa (Landsat 8, March 2021). The greenstone belt here reaches back ~3.5 billion years - some of Earth's oldest intact geology. - NASA Earth Observatory / USGS (Public Domain)

The episode opens with a question: Earth is a living planet now, but it wasn't always. So when did life start, and how did it happen? To have any fighting chance at an answer, you have to go where the record actually exists, and that means going to rocks so old they feel like they shouldn't still be there. That's why the story takes us to the Barberton / Makhonjwa Mountains in southern Africa, a UNESCO World Heritage site that preserves an unusually intact slice of early Earth: greenstone belt rocks reaching back roughly 3.6 to 3.25 billion years.2 If you're going to make claims about “early Earth conditions,” this is one of the rare places where you can point to something tangible.

From there, NOVA paints an Archean Earth that is basically a different world: no breathable oxygen, rampant volcanism, and a young Sun that was measurably weaker than the one we have now. That last point isn't just a casual aside - it opens up a classic puzzle that Earth scientists have wrestled with for decades.

Key Concept - Faint Young Sun Paradox The mismatch between a dimmer early Sun and geological evidence for liquid water on early Earth. Stellar models predict the Sun was putting out roughly 70% of its current luminosity around 4 billion years ago - which should have left the surface frozen solid. Yet the rock record says it wasn't. The resolution almost certainly involves greenhouse gases and early atmospheric chemistry, and it's part of why Archean atmospheric composition matters so much in these discussions.3

The “no oxygen” point isn't narration drama, either. The broad story in geoscience is that Earth didn't have oxygen-rich air until much later - the big shift is associated with the Great Oxidation Event, roughly 2.4 billion years ago. That's why “breathable oxygen” gets treated in this episode like a late arrival. It genuinely was one.4

Reading the Record

One of the things I appreciated is that the episode doesn't just say “we found fossils” and move on. It pauses at the obvious question: okay, but how do you know? Rocks do weird things. Mineral growth does weird things. Your eyes are not a peer-reviewed instrument. A carbon smear in a 3.4-billion-year-old chert could be biological. Or it could be the product of abiotic chemistry that produces the same shapes without cells. The history of early-life claims has enough retractions in it that cautious methodology matters a lot here.

NOVA highlights work associated with Frances Westall, a researcher based in Orléans, France, and the general methodology of comparing ancient candidate microfossils against lab-created analogs - basically entombing modern microbes in silica to see what “real” microbial preservation looks like, then comparing both shape and chemical signatures to ancient samples. That basic posture - don't trust the shape alone; also look for chemistry consistent with biology - is exactly the kind of “show your work” energy you want when the claim on the table is “earliest known life on Earth.”

As someone who writes software for a living - tools that help investigators revisit cold cases, where a wrong answer isn't a bad user experience but a wrong answer about a human life - I have genuine appreciation for this kind of discipline. The instinct to say “shape is necessary but not sufficient; we also need the chemistry to match” maps cleanly onto the software principle of not trusting a single input source. You cross-validate. You look for multiple independent signals converging on the same conclusion. The fact that researchers built exactly that framework for evaluating Archean microfossils is pretty darn impressive.

The Hadean

Pushing the Clock Back

Here's where the timeline pressure really ramps up. If you accept that microbial life is showing up very early in the Archean rock record, then life had to start before that - which pushes you back toward the Hadean, Earth's earliest eon. The name tells you what people used to picture: it's named after Hades, and the traditional mental image is violent - molten surfaces, rampant volcanism, a steady stream of asteroid impacts. The tension that drives the rest of the episode starts here: if early Earth was getting hammered that relentlessly, how could life possibly get started, or survive long enough to matter?

Enter one of my favorite parts of this episode: zircons. Zircon is the kind of mineral that makes you grateful for creation's little durability hacks. Once a zircon crystal forms, it can survive ridiculously long spans of time intact while everything around it gets eroded. So scientists use zircons like tiny time capsules that preserve chemical clues from periods where almost no intact rocks exist. NOVA points to work on Hadean-aged detrital zircons found in Barberton units (often discussed in connection with the Green Sandstone Bed), including published results reporting zircons as old as approximately 4.15 billion years - Hadean material surviving inside later sediments, carrying clues from an era we otherwise have no direct window into.5

Zircon
Formula ZrSiO4;
Barberton Examples Up to ~4.15 Ga (detrital; Green Sandstone Bed)
Survives Erosion, metamorphism, sediment recycling

The key story beat is that zircon chemistry can carry signatures consistent with early water–rock interaction - supporting the broader picture that the Hadean may not have been the uniform global lava ocean it was once imagined to be. Maybe it had wet niches earlier than people used to picture. NOVA also walks through a plausible water supply route: water stored in Earth's mantle, released by volcanism as steam, eventually condensing into surface or near-surface liquid. One of those “here's a mechanism that could explain it” proposals that makes the scenario feel less like wishful thinking and more like a serious hypothesis with testable implications.

The Impact Record

At this point, the episode returns hard to impacts. If most craters on Earth are gone - erased by erosion and plate tectonics over billions of years - how do you know what kind of bombardment early Earth actually experienced? One answer is spherule layers: beds full of tiny spherical particles created by giant impacts, formed as vaporized rock condensed while re-entering the atmosphere from an impact plume, then preserved in ancient strata. Even when the original crater is long gone, the fallout that rained down can get locked into the geologic record. The Barberton formation hosts multiple such layers, treated in the literature as impact ejecta deposits in roughly 3.47–3.24 billion-year-old rocks - exactly the kind of indirect evidence you use when the direct evidence has been erased.6

The episode also draws attention to a truly enormous Archean collision. Recent peer-reviewed work on the ~3.26 billion-year-old impact event lays out the kind of environmental consequences that could follow from a strike of that scale: tsunamis, wholesale ocean mixing, large shifts in marine chemistry.7 These weren't geological curiosities - they were world-scale events with the potential to restructure the oceans.

Then NOVA does a move I really like: if Earth keeps overwriting its own hard drive, use the Moon as the backup. The Moon's surface is old, heavily cratered, and far less geologically “busy” than Earth's, which means it preserves a much cleaner record of early bombardment history. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter laser altimeter products provide extremely detailed lunar topography used for impact mapping and analysis,8 and the episode highlights this kind of lunar data as part of the toolchain scientists use to work backwards and constrain what Earth was experiencing during that same period.

The episode also gives the Moon's own origin story its moment: the giant impact hypothesis, where a Mars-sized body struck the young Earth and the resulting debris coalesced into the Moon. NASA presents this as the leading framework for lunar formation.9

Early Earth - Key Events (Selected, Geological Timescale)
Hadean 4.5 Ga Earth
forms;
Moon impact
Hadean 4.15 Ga Barberton
zircons;
water clues
Archean 4.0 Ga Archean
begins
Archean 3.5 Ga Barberton
rocks &
spherules
Archean 3.26 Ga S2 impact
event
Proterozoic 2.4 Ga Great
Oxidation
Event
Habitat Makers

When Impacts Build Rather Than Destroy

So far, so good: early Earth got hammered. But NOVA isn't trying to end on “and therefore life is impossible.” It's building toward its central claim: asteroids were a double-edged sword. They can wipe life out - but they can also create environments that help life along. That's where hydrothermal systems come in. Hydrothermal settings are popular in origin-of-life thinking because they combine liquid water, minerals, chemical gradients, and energy - everything you'd want if you're trying to get “chemistry that does interesting things” without already having cells to do it.

Here's the twist the episode leans on: hydrothermal systems aren't only driven by volcanism. Big impacts can generate hydrothermal circulation too - by heating the crust and driving water through newly fractured rock. Chicxulub becomes the showpiece because it's the most-studied and best-drilled impact structure we have. IODP/ICDP Expedition 364 focused explicitly on the peak ring and the evidence of post-impact alteration and hydrothermal activity in the crater.10 Peer-reviewed work treats Chicxulub as a serious example of an impact structure producing conditions relevant to habitability: fracturing, heat, circulating water - the basic ingredients of a hydrothermal system, running on impact energy instead of volcanic energy.11

Landsat 8 satellite image of the Yucatán Peninsula showing the buried Chicxulub impact crater structure
Landsat 8 image of the Yucatán Peninsula (November 2014). The ~180 km wide Chicxulub impact structure is buried beneath sediment; IODP/ICDP Expedition 364 drilled its peak ring to study post-impact hydrothermal circulation directly. - Paul Quast / O.V.E.R.V.I.E.W., Landsat 8 / USGS (CC BY 2.0)

NOVA also visits Ries crater in Germany, where exposed rock walls display strange vertical “degassing pipes” - pathways where post-impact heat drove volatile escape and fluid movement through the crater rock. A paper in Meteoritics & Planetary Science addresses the origin and mineralogy of these pipes directly, including evidence of alteration in their interiors.12 It's a nice concrete example you can walk up to in a cliff face, rather than inferring from geochemical proxies alone.

Context Reviews of impact-generated hydrothermal systems in the planetary science literature argue that hydrothermal circulation is a common post-impact phenomenon - not a rare exception - and that such systems can create potentially habitable environments, particularly in the subsurface where stable liquid water, mineral interfaces, and chemical energy gradients can persist long after the initial event.13
The Delivery

Chemistry from Space

Fragment of the Murchison meteorite, a carbonaceous chondrite that fell in Victoria, Australia in 1969
Fragment of the Murchison meteorite (CM2 carbonaceous chondrite), which fell near Murchison, Victoria, Australia in September 1969. Analysis revealed amino acids, nucleobases, and other organics with isotopic ratios inconsistent with terrestrial contamination. - Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Danny Glavin (NASA Goddard) shows up as the “what's actually in these space rocks?” guy, and the episode walks through how meteorites like Murchison (1969) became famous for containing amino acids and other organics. NASA-affiliated researchers have published widely on meteoritic amino acids and the isotopic and chemical methods used to distinguish genuine extraterrestrial signatures from terrestrial contamination.14

But there's an obvious problem the episode addresses head-on: meteorites that land on Earth can become contaminated. The longer they sit in soil, the more they pick up from the surrounding biosphere. That complicates any claim about what's truly from space versus what's from Earth's own biology. You need a cleaner sample.

That's why OSIRIS-REx is such a big deal in this story. If you want to reduce contamination and uncertainty, you go get the sample yourself and bring it home under controlled conditions. NASA reports that OSIRIS-REx returned 121.6 grams of material from asteroid Bennu - the largest asteroid sample return to date.15 NASA's public communications around the Bennu sample emphasize exactly the kind of “life's ingredients” package the episode highlights: amino acids and nucleobases - the chemical bases found in DNA and RNA - detected in the returned material.16

Mosaic of asteroid Bennu compiled from close-proximity observations by NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft
Asteroid (101955) Bennu, mosaic compiled from close-proximity observations by NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft. Bennu is approximately 492 meters across. The sample capsule returned to Earth in September 2023 with 121.6 grams of material; analysis confirmed the presence of amino acids and nucleobases. - NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center / University of Arizona (Public Domain)
The Thesis

At that point, the episode's double-edged sword thesis basically locks into place. What if early impacts didn't just smash things - they also created enormous hydrothermal systems (habitats) while simultaneously delivering the building blocks (chemistry) into those very systems? That doesn't magically solve the origin of life. But it does make early Earth feel less like a pure death trap and more like a chaotic place where the right niches could exist - especially underground or in circulating hydrothermal systems - long enough for prebiotic chemistry to do something meaningful. The violence isn't only destructive. It's potentially generative.

What I walked away with - besides “dang, these labs are cool” - is real appreciation for the method. This episode is less about one flashy claim and more about how scientists stitch a story together from scraps: rare ancient rocks, durable minerals that keep chemical receipts across billions of years, impact debris layers that survive when craters don't, lunar mapping that helps reconstruct history Earth has erased, drilled crater cores that show what impacts really do to rock and water, and sample-return missions that bring chemistry home without the usual contamination mess. Each of those is a different instrument playing part of the same score, and none of them alone is sufficient. You need all of them pointing in the same direction before you can say anything with confidence.

Even if you stay cautious about the big leap from “ingredients plus habitat” to “therefore life began this way,” it's hard not to respect the seriousness of the work - and to come away thinking the universe may have arranged things more generously for life than our first impression of the Hadean would suggest.

Faith & Reason A small note for the Catholic reader, kept small as it should be: the Church's official posture here is not “science bad.” Gaudium et Spes from Vatican II states explicitly that when scientific research is carried out in a genuinely scientific way and within moral norms, it does not truly conflict with faith, because both are ultimately concerned with truth.17 The Catechism states the principle that gets paraphrased as “truth cannot contradict truth” - because faith and reason come from the same God and cannot be in real contradiction.18 An episode about how asteroids may have contributed to the conditions for life is not a threat to that. It's a description of the mechanism, and the Church has never asked us to be incurious about mechanisms.

Sources & Notes

  1. NOVA Season 53, Episode 1, “Asteroids: Spark of Life?” thirteen.org/programs/nova/asteroids-spark-of-life-wb0w2o.
  2. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, “Barberton Makhonjwa Mountains.” Listed for its exceptional geological value as one of the oldest and best-preserved segments of volcanic and sedimentary rock on Earth. whc.unesco.org/en/list/1575.
  3. Faint young Sun paradox: the mismatch between early stellar models predicting ~70% of current solar luminosity at ~4.0 Ga and geological evidence for liquid water. Wikipedia overview.
  4. Great Oxidation Event and the timing of atmospheric oxygen: Luo, G., et al. (2016), “Rapid oxygenation of Earth's atmosphere 2.33 billion years ago,” Science Advances. science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600134.
  5. Hadean-aged detrital zircons from the Barberton Greenstone Belt, including reported ages of ~4.15 Ga: Erickson, T.M., et al. (2020), PNAS. pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2004370118.
  6. Impact spherule layers in the Barberton Greenstone Belt as ejecta deposits from ~3.47–3.24 Ga impacts: Lowe, D.R., & Byerly, G.R. (2003), Astrobiology. PubMed/12804363.
  7. The ~3.26 Ga S2 impact event and its environmental implications for early Earth, including tsunami evidence and ocean perturbation. PMC11536127.
  8. NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter laser altimeter (LOLA) data products, Planetary Geodesy and Geophysics Data Archive. pgda.gsfc.nasa.gov/products/54.
  9. Giant impact hypothesis for lunar formation: NASA Science, “Moon: Formation.” science.nasa.gov/moon/formation.
  10. IODP/ICDP Expedition 364, Chicxulub peak ring drilling, post-impact hydrothermal processes. publications.iodp.org/proceedings/364/101/364_101.html.
  11. Chicxulub impact structure as a model for impact-generated habitability - fracturing, hydrothermal circulation, and astrobiological relevance. AGU Advances (2020).
  12. Origin and mineralogy of Ries crater degassing pipes, including alteration evidence in pipe interiors. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. Wiley/maps.13600.
  13. Review of impact-generated hydrothermal systems as a common post-impact phenomenon and their potential to create habitable subsurface environments. Icarus. ScienceDirect.
  14. Meteoritic amino acids and methods for distinguishing extraterrestrial signatures from terrestrial contamination, NASA Goddard researchers: Glavin, D.P., et al. ACS Central Science.
  15. OSIRIS-REx returned 121.6 grams of material from asteroid Bennu, the largest asteroid sample return to date: NASA OSIRIS-REx blog, February 2024. science.nasa.gov.
  16. NASA communications on amino acids and nucleobases detected in the Bennu sample: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio. svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/14772.
  17. Gaudium et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World), Vatican II, 1965, §36: “[M]ethodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God.” Vatican text.
  18. Catechism of the Catholic Church, on faith and reason: “[S]ince the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth.” CCC online.